Economic Impact Report

What this document is

The State A / State B economic model for Hill County: what the County pays under the current system and under the CSA, and what it receives — each flow reported separately.

Three things this document says
  1. State A is disposal with a single dominant operator at a blended ~$100/ton, escalating on the operator’s cycle.
  2. State B: a $3.65M Year-1 Beneficiation Fee at Phase Initial, and a Circular Royalty™ of $4.38M in Year 2 growing to ~$218M gross over 30 years.
  3. Two independent gross transactions, reported separately; zero County capital; 25 direct FTE at Phase Initial and 280 at Phase Expanded.
Carbotura · Circular Advantage Program · Economic Impact Report

Hillsboro, Texas
Economic Impact Report

State A leaves Hill County with one operator and an annual escalation cycle — State B converts the same volume into a 30-year royalty return.

Document: Stage 1 Economic Impact Report Prepared for: City of Hillsboro / Hill County, Texas Date: April 2026 Basis: State A from the Feedstock System Assessment; State B from the Proposal EIR Input Block; FWDC ESTIMATED, employment and impact figures ESTIMATED

§1 Introduction and Decision Summary

§1.1What This Report Measures

This EIR quantifies the difference between two futures for Hill County's manufacturing-feedstock streams over a 30-year horizon.

  • State A (Without Carbotura). The current disposal model continues. Hill County feedstock flows to Republic Itasca Landfill at the current FWDC trajectory. Disposal cost escalates at the documented Texas regional rate (~3.5%/yr, CPI+1pp). No new revenue offsets accrue. Republic Services concentration risk persists.
  • State B (With Carbotura). A 30-year CSA executes. ACM Phase Initial commissions Q2 2028. Beneficiation Fee replaces FWDC for committed streams. Circular Royalty™ begins Month 13 and escalates +1pp/yr. Phasing scales 100 → 200 → 400 → 1,000 → 2,000 TPD over 60 months. Phase Expanded conditional on Tier 3 partnerships.

This report does not re-diagnose State A (Waste Study's role) and does not re-define State B (Proposal's role). Its function is only the delta.

§1.2Decision Summary Table

ItemValue
State A — annual disposal cost (Phase Initial volume, Year 1 baseline)~$3.0M (Hill County)
State B — annual TMC obligation Year 1 (Phase Initial)$3.65M
State B — annual Circular Royalty™ Year 2 (Phase Initial)$4.38M
Combined fiscal benefit — 30-yr cumulative, full Phase Expanded with Tier 3 partnershipsESTIMATED +$3B+
Capital obligation to County$0
Regulatory Predicate Transition (RPT) Standing condition. Both parties commit to the dewaste pathway — manufacturing NAICS required, waste NAICS excluded (562213/562219). Manufacturing NAICS required (325180, 325998, 327992, 331110, 331314, 331492). Basis: RCRA §1004(27) · 40 CFR §261.2(e). MR §3.
Key data gapsFWDC verification (Term Sheet phase verification); Tier 3 partnership instruments; stream-specific feedstock composition
Decision deadline (procurement authorization)Q2 2026 — concurrent with engagement start, to preserve Phase Initial COD Q2 2028
Cost of delay~$1.8–$2.2M Year-2 Royalty foregone per 6-month slip (Phase Initial scale); $25–35M at Phase Expanded scale

§1.3Fiscal vs. Regional Economic Separation

Required statement

County fiscal effects (Royalty receipts, TMC outflows, cost displacement) and regional economic impact (employment, regional GDP, tax base) are distinct categories. They are not interchangeable. Royalty receipts flow to the County treasury; regional economic impact flows to the broader Hillsboro Triangle economy and does not appear on the County balance sheet. This EIR maintains that separation throughout.

§2 State A Baseline

Source: Waste Study. Locked Registry values. No new diagnosis introduced.

§2.1Feedstock Volume and Disposition (Phase Initial)

StreamTPYTPDCurrent DispositionOperator
Hill County MSW (residential + commercial)~25,500~70Republic Itasca LandfillFrontier Waste / Republic Services
Hill County C&D residuals~5,500~15Republic Itasca + regional C&DMixed haulers
Hill County industrial / commercial special~3,650~10Mixed regional disposalMixed
Hill County WWTP biosolids~1,825~5Land application / co-disposalCity of Hillsboro WWTP
Hill County base load (State A)~36,475~100

§2.2State A Cost Structure

Cost ElementAnnual Year 1Per-TonSource Type
Hill County MSW disposal (collector-facing)~$2,090,000~$82Estimated
Hill County C&D disposal~$385,000~$70Estimated
Hill County industrial / commercial special~$330,000~$90Estimated
Hill County WWTP biosolids disposal~$170,000~$95Estimated
Hill County all-stream blended State A cost~$2,975,000~$82Modeled
Data gap

Republic Services and Frontier Waste specific contract terms with Hill County, City of Hillsboro, and individual commercial customers are not publicly documented at the level required for FWDC verification. Confirmation deferred to Term Sheet phase verification contract review.

§2.3State A Cost Trajectory

Three documented mechanisms drive forward State A cost growth: (1) Rate escalation — Texas commercial waste contracts include CPI + 1pp annual escalators; Republic and WM published schedules show ~3.5–4.5%/yr increases. (2) Capital reinvestment pressure — Itasca, Mexia, Lacy Lakeview, and Fort Worth Southeast all undergoing or scheduling cell expansion 2024–2030; capex passes through to gate rates. (3) Absence of competitive alternatives — Republic controls 3 of 4 catchment-area landfills; smaller independents have exited central Texas through consolidation.

YearTPYFWDC / tonState A Annual Cost
136,475$82$2.99M
536,475$94$3.43M
1036,475$111$4.05M
2036,475$157$5.73M
3036,475$221$8.07M
30-yr cumulative State A cost (Hill County base load)~$165M

§2.4State A Environmental and Structural Position

  • Net carbon position (State A): All committed Hill County feedstock continues to landfill. Methane emissions from landfilled organics continue per Republic Itasca operating profile.
  • PFAS exposure: Industrial and biosolids streams continue to landfill or land-apply with no PFAS destruction. Federal regulation (2026–2027) may impose treatment or destination requirements that elevate State A cost trajectory above the +3.5%/yr baseline.
  • Operator concentration: Republic Services dominates 3 of 4 catchment landfills. Single-counterparty pricing exposure is structural and compounds with each annual escalation cycle.
  • Capital exposure: $0 immediate but cumulative future exposure as Republic facilities expand cells, passed through gate rates.

§3 State B Deployment Baseline

Source: Proposal EIR Input Block. No re-derivation.

§3.1Inherited Flags Declaration

Flags carried forward from the Proposal and Registry (disclosed above in the inherited-flags block): FWDC ESTIMATED · T0 ESTIMATED · Hill County feedstock composition ESTIMATED · Tier 3 partnerships NOT YET COMMITTED · Phase Expanded conditional on inter-jurisdictional instruments not yet executed.

§3.2Deployment Configuration

PhaseTPDModule MathTPYCODT0 Offset
Phase Initial100ceil(100/100) = 136,500Q2 2028T0 + 24mo
Stage 2200ceil(200/100) = 273,000Q3 2029T0 + 39mo
Phase Medium400ceil(400/100) = 4146,000Q4 2030T0 + 54mo
Stage 41,000ceil(1000/100) = 10365,000Q1 2032T0 + 69mo
Phase Expanded2,000ceil(2000/100) = 20730,000Q2 2033T0 + 84mo

§3.3Economic Terms

ParameterValue
Beneficiation Fee Year 1$100 / ton — Verified user-confirmed
TMC escalator2.5% / year
Royalty rate Year 1120% of TMC
Royalty escalator+1 percentage point / year
Royalty payment lag13 months, rolling monthly
CSA term30 years from Phase Initial COD
Capital obligation to counterparty$0 (BOO structure)

§3.5Timeline Anchoring

EventDateT0 Offset
T0 — engagement startQ2 2026T0
Procurement decision deadlineQ2 2026T0
Term Sheet phase verification completeQ3 2026T0 + 3mo
Phase Initial construction startQ4 2026T0 + 6mo
Phase Initial CODQ2 2028T0 + 24mo
First Circular Royalty™ paymentQ3 2029T0 + 37mo
Phase Expanded CODQ2 2033T0 + 84mo
CSA term endQ2 2058T0 + 30yr

§3.6Phase Delta Map

State A infrastructure (grey/steel pins) versus State B Priority 1 ACM site (emerald square). The map shows why the spatial and logistic transition from State A to State B is a route-convergence, not a route-extension — all existing Hill County feedstock flows already pass within 15 miles of the Priority 1 I-35 Industrial Corridor site.

Interactive map requires a Google Maps API key.

Set GOOGLE_MAPS_API_KEY in config.js.

Right panel remains fully functional without a map key.

§4 Delta Analysis

§4.1Three Delta Components

The State A → State B transition produces three independent fiscal components, each quantified separately:

  1. Gross cost displacement — State A FWDC obligation that no longer accrues under State B (feedstock redirects to ACM rather than landfill).
  2. Circular Royalty™ cash flow — New revenue inflow to the County treasury. $0 Year 1 (13-month lag); rolling-monthly thereafter; escalating +1pp/yr.
  3. Residual obligation — State A cost continuing during the construction window (T0 → Phase Initial COD) and for any non-committed streams.

"Gross cost displacement is quantified separately from Circular Royalty™ cash flow.

"At steady state, the Circular Royalty™ is designed to exceed the Beneficiation Fee on a per-ton basis."

"Circular Royalty™ payments begin 13 months after corresponding Beneficiation Fee payments and ramp to full run-rate on a rolling basis."

§4.1Phase-by-Phase Comparative Table

PhaseACM Volume (TPY)State A / tonTMC / tonGross Delta / tonRoyalty Y1 / tonRoyalty Y2+ / tonCapital
Phase Initial36,500$82−$100−$18$0 (lag)+$120$0
Phase Medium146,000$90−$110−$20$0+$132$0
Phase Expanded730,000$103−$125−$22$0+$156$0

Pre-Royalty Period Separation

Year 1 and post-Month 13 periods have materially different fiscal characteristics. They must not be combined.

  • Year 1 (Pre-Royalty, Months 1–12): County pays Beneficiation Fee at $100/ton. Receives $0 in Circular Royalty™.
  • Royalty Ramp (Year 2, Months 13–24): Circular Royalty™ payments begin 13 months after corresponding Beneficiation Fee payments and ramp to full run-rate on a rolling basis.
  • Steady-state (Year 3 onward): At steady state, the Circular Royalty™ is designed to exceed the Beneficiation Fee on a per-ton basis. Each subsequent year adds +1 percentage point to the royalty rate.

§4.430-Year Gross Cost Displacement Table

Hill County base load (Phase Initial only, no Tier 3 partnerships) — conservative base case. State A FWDC escalated at 3.5%/yr.

YearTPYState A Cost (escalated)Avoided in State BCumulative Avoided
136,500$2.99M$2.99M$2.99M
536,500$3.43M$3.43M$15.7M
1036,500$4.05M$4.05M$34.2M
2036,500$5.73M$5.73M$82M
3036,500$8.07M$8.07M$165M
30-yr cumulative gross cost displacement (Phase Initial only)~$165M

§4.530-Year Circular Royalty™ Table

Phase Initial only base case (Hill County base load, 36,500 TPY held constant).

YearTMC PaidRoyalty Received (Y2+ rolling)
1$3.65M$0
2$3.74M$4.38M
5$4.03M$4.83M
10$4.56M$5.70M
20$5.83M$7.87M
30$7.47M$10.83M

Royalty figures are amounts received. The royalty is paid 13 months in arrears, so the figure shown for a year is earned on the previous year’s delivered tonnage.

§4.6Three-Item Gross Fiscal Chart

Gross Fiscal Position — Avoided Disposal / Beneficiation Fee / Circular Royalty™
Three independent gross streams shown separately —
Carbotura Circular Royalty™ formula · $100/ton TMC Year 1 · $82/ton FWDC Hill County · 120% base royalty · +1pp/yr escalator · 13-month lag · Phase Initial 36,500 TPY · ESTIMATED
Year-by-Year Delta — Full Schedule (Years 1–30)
YearState A CostTMC PaidRoyalty Received
1$2.99M−$3.65M$0
2$3.07M−$3.74M+$4.38M
3$3.15M−$3.83M+$4.53M
5$3.43M−$4.03M+$4.83M
10$4.05M−$4.56M+$5.70M
20$5.73M−$5.83M+$7.87M
30$8.07M−$7.47M+$10.83M

Royalty figures are amounts received. The royalty is paid 13 months in arrears, so the figure shown for a year is earned on the previous year’s delivered tonnage.

Year 1: $2.99M avoided − $3.65M TMC = −$0.66M. Year 2+: each year inverting and growing. All figures Phase Initial base case (36,500 TPY held constant).

§5 System-Level Impact

§5.1Employment Delta

Required disclaimer

§5.1 reflects regional employment impacts, not County treasury receipts. These flow to the Hillsboro Triangle workforce; they do not flow to the Hill County general fund.

PhaseState A Direct (disposal)State B Direct FTEDelta (Direct FTE)Indirect Jobs (×2.5)Annual Economic Impact (regional)
Phase Initial~325+22+55+$4M
Phase Medium~570+65+163+$14M
Phase Expanded~12280+268+670+$58M

§5.2Environmental Delta (designed-for language)

AttributeState AState B (designed-for performance)
Carbon position (committed feedstock)Net positive emissions (landfill methane + transport)Net carbon negative (graphite sequestration + internal hydrogen power) — designed-for
Landfill diversion0% of committed feedstock~100% of committed feedstock — designed-for
Internal energyN/AHydrogen powers facility internally; near-zero external grid draw — designed-for
External hydrogen offtakeN/ANone — internal use only

§5.3PFAS Structural Delta

State A: Industrial and biosolids streams continue to landfill or land-apply with no PFAS destruction. Federal regulation (2026–2027) expected to impose treatment or destruction-efficiency requirements that elevate State A cost trajectory above the documented +3.5%/yr baseline.

State B: ACM (MCR) is designed to achieve high PFAS destruction efficiency on processable feedstock streams. Committing PFAS-bearing streams to ACM positions Hill County ahead of forthcoming federal regulation. Designed-for performance basis; stream-specific PFAS destruction efficiency confirmation deferred to Term Sheet phase verification.

§5.4No-Fallback Analysis

Should State A continue and the regional siting window pass without Hill County engagement:

  1. Republic concentration risk persists indefinitely. Three-of-four-landfill operator concentration creates structural pricing-power exposure compounding with each annual escalation cycle.
  2. First-mover RCRA-eligible procurement window closes. Other Texas regional communities absorb available ACM siting capacity. Re-entry available but on later, less favorable terms.
  3. Regional partnership coordination cycle restarts. Fort Worth and Waco 18–24-month coordination cycle must begin from a later T0; Phase Expanded shifts proportionally.
  4. PFAS regulatory exposure direct. Federal rule promulgation (2026–2027) imposes State A cost step-changes without a Royalty offset.

There is no "do nothing" scenario that preserves optionality at zero cost. Inaction has compounding cost.

§6 Risk and Sensitivity

§6.1Structured Risk Register

#RiskDriverBearerQuantificationMitigationResidual
1FWDC verificationFWDC ESTIMATED at $100/ton blendedBoth$20/ton variation = ~$3.7M annual State A cost variation at Phase MediumTerm Sheet phase verification FWDC auditLow
2Technology performanceMCR commercial-scale vs. designCarbotura$0 to County (BOO)Performance guarantees; conversion efficiency thresholds; reserve accountLow
3Timeline slippagePermitting, financing, constructionBoth$1.8–$2.2M Year-2 Royalty foregone per 6mo slip (Phase Initial)Standard 24mo construction window; cure provisionsMedium
4Republic concentration3 of 4 catchment landfills under single operatorCounty (incumbent contracts)+1pp/yr above CPI escalation = ~$3M cumulative Year 30 vs. baselineStaggered phase scaling; CSA hauler-direction provisionsMedium
5Competitive procurementOther operators approach catchment communitiesBothFirst-mover positioning erosion if delay >12 monthsRPT-aligned classification; 30-year exclusivity in CSALow
6PFAS regulatoryFederal PFAS rules 2026–2027County (State A); Carbotura (feedstock spec)State A cost step-change $5–$15/ton estimatedACM PFAS destruction; feedstock spec in CSALow
7Tier 3 partnership coordinationFW + Waco instruments require 18–24mo of intergovernmental workBothPhase Expanded slip 12mo per uncoordinated party = ~$15M Year-1 Royalty foregone at scaleBegin Tier 3 coordination concurrent with Hill County CSA executionMedium
8TCEQ permit durationTexas state regulatory environment may shiftCarboturaPermit denial = Carbotura withdrawal under RPTTCEQ engagement during Term Sheet phase verification; RPT withdrawal protectionLow
9Manufacturing classification confirmationRegulatory classification outcomeBothAdverse outcome = Carbotura withdrawal under RPT; County retains State ARPT structure protects both parties from misclassification deploymentLow (RPT-aligned)
10Macro inflation / interest-rateSPV financing close in elevated-rate environmentCarbotura$0 to County (BOO); affects Carbotura WACC and SPV termsStaged construction; standard refinancing provisionsLow (to County)
11Workforce availability — regionalSkilled operations, technical, engineering hire in central TexasCarboturaHire delay = COD slip riskLocal-hire targeting; apprenticeship partnerships with Hill CollegeLow
12Aquilla Aquifer proximity (Site P3)If P3 selected, groundwater environmental reviewCarboturaMitigation cost or P3 disqualificationStandard environmental review during Term Sheet phase verification; P1 default if P3 disqualifiedLow

§6.2Feedstock Variability Sensitivity (±20%)

PhaseBase TPD−20%+20%Phase Initial Year-2 Royalty Impact
Phase Initial10080120±$0.88M annual
Phase Medium400320480±$3.87M annual
Phase Expanded2,0001,6002,400±$22.8M annual

§6.3FWDC Sensitivity — Sign-Change Threshold

Sign-change threshold: none

(Royalty per ton) − (TMC per ton) + (Avoided Disposal per ton) > 0.

For Year 2 Phase Initial: Royalty ($120) − TMC ($102.50) = . State B is robust to FWDC variation. This is a structural feature of the Carbotura formula, not a model artifact.

§6.4Royalty Escalator Sensitivity (0 / +1 / +2 pp)

EscalatorYear 30 Royalty RateYear 30 Royalty / tonYear 30 Annual Royalty (Phase Expanded)
0 pp/yr (no escalation)120%$245.57$179M
+1 pp/yr (base case)149%$296.77$216.6M
+2 pp/yr (upside)178%$354.94$259M

§6.5Timeline Slippage Sensitivity

SlippagePhase Initial CODFirst Royalty
0 (base case)Q2 2028Q3 2029
+6 monthsQ4 2028Q1 2030
+12 monthsQ2 2029Q3 2030
+24 monthsQ2 2030Q3 2031

§7 Decision Window Analysis

§7.1Binding Constraints

  1. T0 anchor + 24-month construction. Phase Initial COD requires ~24 months from financing close. T0 = Q2 2026 places Phase Initial COD at Q2 2028. Each month of T0 slippage moves COD month-for-month.
  2. Classification pathway. Manufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33) is the classification basis of every engagement. First-mover communities secure positioning advantages.
  3. Republic Services contract escalation cycle. Each annual escalation cycle compounds State A cost without offsetting Royalty inflow. Beginning the CSA before the next Republic rate-cycle close preserves comparison clarity.

§7.2Decision Window Table

Decide ByPhase Initial COD
Q2 2026 (engagement start)Q2 2028
Q4 2026Q4 2028
Q2 2027Q2 2029
Q4 2027Q4 2029
Q2 2028Q2 2030

§7.3Irreversibility Mechanism

Finding — Competitive Irreversibility

Hillsboro does not face a single binding regulatory irreversibility (no landfill closure order, no diversion mandate trigger). The irreversibility is competitive and capacity-driven: each month that passes, more Texas regional communities enter Carbotura engagement pipelines. Texas regional ACM siting capacity is finite.

The basis of this irreversibility is manufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33) — the federal classification basis under which all Carbotura CSAs proceed.

§7.4Optionality Matrix

DecisionPhase Initial OptionalityTier 3 Partnership OptionalityRCRA First-Mover Optionality
Authorize Phase Initial Q2 2026PreservedPreserved (separately negotiable)Preserved
Authorize Q4 2026Preserved (moderate slip)Preserved (slight slip)Preserved (modest erosion)
Authorize Q2 2027Preserved (notable slip)Preserved (12mo slip)Eroding
Authorize Q2 2028Preserved (24mo slip)At-riskSignificantly eroded
Defer indefinitelyForfeit Phase Initial Y2-30 Circular Royalty™ (~$218M)ForfeitForfeit

§8 Effects Summary

No new figures introduced. All values trace to §1–§7.

§8.1Fiscal Effects (County Treasury)

§8.2Regional Economic Effects

Disclaimer

§8.2 figures are regional economic effects, not County treasury receipts. They do not appear on the County balance sheet.

Phase at full opsDirect FTEIndirectAnnual Regional Economic Impact
Phase Initial2563$4M
Phase Medium70175$14M
Phase Expanded280700$58M

Plus property tax base addition of $75M–$1.17B (phase-dependent capital improvement).

§8.3Environmental Effects

Disclaimer

§8.3 figures reflect designed-for performance basis. Stream-specific environmental performance verification deferred to Term Sheet phase verification and operational reporting.

  • Net carbon position: Net carbon negative across all committed feedstock under State B (designed-for); net carbon positive under State A.
  • Landfill diversion: ~100% of committed streams under State B (designed-for); 0% under State A.
  • PFAS structural exposure: Material reduction under State B for industrial and biosolids streams; unchanged under State A.

§8.4Structural Effects

  • Operator concentration: Republic Services dominance persists under State A; partially offset under State B as committed feedstock redirects to ACM.
  • Capital exposure: $0 to County under State B vs. cumulative future capital exposure under State A (cell expansion pass-through at Republic facilities).
  • Federal regulatory positioning: State B aligns with NAICS manufacturing classification (RPT-aligned); State A retains solid-waste disposal classification exposure.

§8.5Unresolved Data Gaps

GapImpactResolution Path
Hill County stream-specific FWDC compositionAffects per-ton State A cost precisionTerm Sheet phase verification contract review with Frontier Waste, Republic Services
Frontier Waste Solutions Hill County contract termsAffects timing of contract migrationTerm Sheet phase verification contract review
City of Hillsboro WWTP biosolids destination specificsAffects $170k/yr Hill County biosolids stream commitmentService-agreement coordination with City
Tier 3 partnership entity-specific commitmentsAffects Phase Stage 4 / Phase Expanded sizing certaintyInter-jurisdictional coordination 2026–2028
Texas TCEQ permit timeline specifics for ACM facilityAffects Phase Initial COD certaintyTerm Sheet phase verification TCEQ pre-application engagement
Manufacturing classification confirmationAffects engagement continuationManufacturing classification (NAICS 31–33)
Aquilla Aquifer detailed proximity assessment for Site P3Affects P3 site eligibilitySite selection environmental review

A Sources and Methodology

State A baseline: Sourced from Waste Study (Section 1 of engagement). State B baseline: Sourced from Proposal EIR Input Block (Section 2 of engagement).

FWDC derivation: Per Waste Study Appendix B (per-capita generation × Texas regional median × phase-weighted blending). Beneficiation Fee formula: MAX($100, MIN($150, FWDC − $5)); escalator 2.5%/yr; user-confirmed at $100/ton Year 1.

Circular Royalty™ formula: Royalty(m+13) = TMC(m) × Royalty_Rate(m); 120% base; +1pp/yr escalator; 13mo lag; rolling monthly. All per locked Carbotura standard parameters.

Phase sizing: User intake — 100 / 200 / 400 / 1,000 / 2,000 TPD over 60 months from Phase Initial COD. Employment: Carbotura standard FTE-per-TPD ratios. Timeline: Carbotura standard deployment schedule (T0 + 24mo Phase Initial COD). Environmental: Designed-for basis per Carbotura standard ACM performance specifications.

Operator verification: Google Places lookup (April 2026); corroborated against operator websites and public NYSE filings (RSG, WM).

B EIR Glossary Additions

Full document-suite glossary in Waste Study Appendix D. EIR-specific terms:

  • Gross Cost Displacement — State A FWDC obligation that no longer accrues under State B because feedstock redirects to ACM. Displaces State A cost; does not flow to treasury as a revenue item.
  • Fiscal Flows, Shown Separately — The combination of TMC paid (outflow) + Circular Royalty™ received (inflow) + Avoided disposal (cost displacement, not inflow). Reader-derived from three gross items.
  • Pre-Royalty Period — Months 1–12 (Year 1) of Phase Initial operations. TMC paid; $0 Royalty due to 13-month lag.
  • Royalty Ramp Period — Months 13–24 (Year 2). Rolling monthly Royalty payments begin and ramp to full run-rate.
  • Steady-State Period — Year 3 onward. Royalty exceeds TMC on a per-ton basis structurally.
  • Delta Model — Comparative analytical framework quantifying State A → State B transition. Does not re-diagnose State A or re-define State B.

★ Basis of Presentation

This EIR quantifies the State A → State B transition for Hill County, Texas over a 30-year horizon. All State A figures are sourced from the Waste Study. All State B figures are sourced from the Proposal EIR Input Block. No new figures are introduced here. Each value is classified by confidence tier.

ParameterValue AppliedBasisConfidence
Phase Initial 100 TPD / 36,500 TPYCOD Q2 2028 · T0 + 24moUser-confirmed; Carbotura standard deployment scheduleLocked
Beneficiation Fee Year 1 = $100/tonEscalating 2.5%/yrUser-confirmed at engagement intakeLocked
State A FWDC Hill County = $82/tonEscalating 3.5%/yrTexas regional gate rate median + collection increment — modeledEstimated
Phase Initial 30-yr combined fiscal benefit~$218M / ~$165MCircular Royalty™ (~$218M) and avoided disposal (~$165M), reported separatelyEstimated
Phase Expanded combined fiscal benefitESTIMATED +$3B+Modeled — full Tier 3 partnerships materialized; conditionalEstimated · Conditional
Operator verificationRepublic Services ×3, WM ×1, Frontier Waste ×1Google Places + NYSE filings, April 2026Verified

Unresolved Data Gaps

  • Hill County stream-specific FWDC — resolved during Term Sheet phase verification contract review.
  • T0 confirmation — procurement decision authorization date.
  • Tier 3 partnership entity-specific commitments — inter-jurisdictional coordination 2026–2028.
  • Texas TCEQ permit timeline — pre-application engagement during Term Sheet phase verification.
  • Manufacturing classification confirmation.

Confidence tiers: Locked = user-confirmed or contractually standard Verified = sourced to named public record Estimated = Carbotura-modeled with stated methodology Provisional = pre-Feasibility-Study placeholder.

Was this economic impact report useful?
Indicative reference only — not an offer. All financial figures are Carbotura planning-basis estimates unless marked VERIFIED. The blended FWDC of $100/ton is ESTIMATED across the I-35 corridor — Hill County gate rates verify at $82/ton, Fort Worth metro at $108/ton and Waco metro at $95/ton. The Beneficiation Fee of $100/ton and all Circular Royalty™ figures are ESTIMATED on Carbotura standard parameters and subject to Term Sheet phase verification. Site options are PROVISIONAL. Phase Medium and Phase Expanded volumes assume regional partnership volumes that are not yet contracted. Assumption Registry LOCKED WITH WARNINGS, April 2026. The Beneficiation Fee and the Circular Royalty™ are independent gross transactions and are not netted or combined anywhere in this package.